Articles

Home  >  Articles  >  Embracing Idealism     Printable Version Tell a friend

Embracing Idealism

Thursday, January 25, 2007

(The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation)

Embracing Idealism

by Richard C. Harwood
Gore issues a call to action: How will voters respond?

- msnbc.com, August 17, 2000

Washington, Aug. 17 - In his acceptance speech in Los Angeles tonight, Vice President Al Gore presented himself as the presidential candidate on the side of the people, not the powerful. Invoking the names of Martin Luther King, Jr. and the two slain Kennedy brothers, he and other Democratic leaders at the convention reminded voters all week of the partyís roots and sought to inspire Americans to a higher calling. This sounds good from the speakerís podium, but what do they actually mean? Does Gore have the ideas to match his idealism?

IN PHILADELPHIA, Texas Gov. George W. Bush rallied his troops around the idea of ìcompassionate conservatism.î Articulating just what that means will be one of the challenges the Republican nominee must meet in the coming months in order to bring Americans to his side. Gore faces a similar challenge.

A Challenge to Do Better

The rhetoric this week in Los Angeles has focused on the idea that Americaís prosperity raises the very challenge for the nation to do better. Americans are being called on to resist the sheer comforts and complacency that prosperity can bring as much works remains to be done throughout this land. How the nation responds, Democratic leaders argue, will tell us about the strength of our collective character.

Linking Americaís prosperity with a call to improve life for all citizens, Al Gore issues a call to action: Now he must provide the details.
Democrats are seeking vigilantly to ground this ìcallingî in their roots - reminding Americans of the 1960 Democratic National Convention held in Los Angeles, and the mantle of the New Frontier that John F. Kennedy would later carry into his presidency. Kennedy, like King, challenged individual Americans to take action in their own lives - to be called to something higher. They focused less on making promises, more on seeking to inspire others to act.

A calling typically stirs someoneís soul. It prompts people to look at themselves in the mirror. It challenges them to examine their assumptions and actions. It inspires people to reach beyond themselves. People are called upon to act, to change, to be transformed.

At the heart of the ìprosperity challengeî now put forth by the Democrats is the need for individual citizens to rise up and cross those new frontiers. But just what do the vice president and his supporters have in mind when they sound this call?

Lost Idealism

Former presidential candidate Bill Bradley spoke eloquently at the convention, calling on each of us not to lose our idealism. He asserted that individual citizens themselves can make a difference. Earlier in the week, the Rev. Jesse Jackson sounded a similar theme, ending his rip-roaring talk with a litany of examples of where a single vote made a difference in history - signaling to every citizen in the land that they themselves hold such power.

But thus far there is something missing in the call to Americans: specifics. Just what is it that the vice president believes Americans should do? Toward what end should they summon their idealism? How should they use their power? What assumptions and actions must we change?

Until now, most Democrats have suggested meeting the prosperity challenge by enacting new government initiatives such as reducing class size in our public schools, providing health care coverage for all children, ramping up prescription drug coverage for seniors, and protecting Social Security for future retirees. All laudable goals.

Whatís more, the vice president promises to hold town meetings throughout his presidency as a way to show that he is on the side of the people. Such meetings were enormously helpful to Gore in connecting with his fellow Tennesseans as a member of Congress and in the Senate.

Is his call to Americans simply a hope that people will say ìyesî to more government programs and services? Surely, generating the political will needed to support such efforts would be a tremendous feat. But he has chosen to echo the sentiments of years past, asking Americans to respond to a higher calling.

What Does This Mean?

As this campaign unfolds, and the vice president makes his case, perhaps we should be thinking about these questions: What is the calling the vice president hears - for himself and for each American? What is the challenge before us that gives rise to such a calling? And what does this calling ask each of us to do and why?

The vice president has been saying over the past few weeks that he believes he owes it to the American people to be specific in his ideas for how to move the nation forward. For him, typically that has meant outlining a series of government programs. But if he seeks to inspire Americans to take new and transformative action, that wonít be enough.

 

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.5.