Printable Version Tell a friend

Republican National Convention - Day 2

Thursday, January 25, 2007

(The Harwood Institute for Public Innovation)

Republican National Convention - Day 2

Guest: Richard C. Harwood, Special to MSNBC

MSNBC-Will: Ok guys, we're starting with Rich Harwood in just a few. Rich is an expert on voter behavior and a political analyst. yesterday we talked a lot about education today's theme for the convention is National security Ok great! I've got Mr. Harwood here on the line. and I've got questions, so let's go Welcome Mr. Harwood.

ASKMSNBC: independent-guest says: I think the GOP is having a convention Bump right now which is typical but if the DEMs can proove the difference in the 2 they will win but if both party's appear to be the same Bush has a chance a cosmetic chance

Rich_Harwood: I don't agree. I think either man has a chance to win, if they put forth a sensible, and realistic vision for the country. And if they demonstrate character in doing so... It's not for Mr. Gore to lose this election, it is for either man to win.

ASKMSNBC: bruno-guest says: Anyone notice the media doesn't know how to handle the new tone or face of the W Bush GOP?

Rich_Harwood: Yes, I agree with that. I think it's because it's not clear whether or not this new GOP face grows out of someone's beliefs and character, or whether it is simply some ideas that were focus group tested, which is how much of politics is done today. I think the American public should wait and see how things unfold, give both these men a chance, and time will tell the difference between what's real and simply what's been made up. The news media also has to hold its breath, and report not just on their disbelief in what someone is saying, but I think has some responsibility to report on what that person is actually trying to put forth as well.

ASKMSNBC: steve_baxley-guest365 says: why is it that the media seems to be the bad guys during, before ,and after these campaigns, especially one channel which has admitted to being a tool for the republican party .making what monica did to clinton look like a badly made porn film....why cant the media ever be welcomed if not cheered

Rich_Harwood: I think there are lots of places where the media are cheered, and where they do quite a good job. But I think overall the American people do not feel that the media reflects the reality of situations, but rather moves toward hype, sensationalism, and trying to drum up ratings and reader circulation to benefit their bottom line. There is a real issue of trust and credibility for the media within America today.

ASKMSNBC: duck-guest says: Would it be possible to reveal that Gore and Cheney's abortion votes were the same, except for 1?

ASKMSNBC: duck-guest says: Would it be possible to point out that Bill Nelson, with whom Clinton attended 3 fundraisers yesterday, voted the same as Cheney on the Mandela issue?

Rich_Harwood: If those are facts, they would be worthwhile to bring forth. I think the question with Cheney is whether or not he can tell America not just about his votes, and that the times were different then, but if he can explain why he believed what he did at the time of those votes, whether or not he has learned anything since then, and whether or not that has altered his policy positions, in terms of how the nation moves forward from hereon out. Otherwise we'll be stuck in another cat and mouse game, of simply trying to prove that Cheney is somehow not coming clean, which really doesn't help the process move forward.

ASKMSNBC: guest-wanda says: Rich, I ask you yesterday what you thought the media would do to Laura Bush and her speech, well, I think she hit it out of the ballpark and the first words I heard our of Judy Woodridge mouth, was what a political speech that was, can you believe????

Rich_Harwood: Yes, I can, I can believe it. Because I think Laura Bush's speech may have straddled the fence too closely. At times she was talking about her own beliefs, but at other times she was making veiled digs at the Democrats, which sounded like lines, written by an experienced speechwriter, and so she entered, I believe, the political realm, when she should have stayed in the realm of her own beliefs and her relationship to the Republican nominee.

MSNBC-Will: The other big speech of the night....

ASKMSNBC: hootie-guest says: What influence will Colin Powell have at the GOP Convention?

Rich_Harwood: Colin Powell can have a significant impact on this country. Whether or not he gives the GOP a bump depends more on George Bush at this point and what he says than what Colin Powell did Monday night. But I thought Colin Powell was brilliant.

ASKMSNBC: maggi58 says: What does our guest think about the total focus on feel good issues. Is it that foreign policy and national security have no sex appeal to voters?

Rich_Harwood: I think Colin Powell got the closest we'll see to someone raising tough issues, and I think both parties would be much better off if they followed his lead on that, but for the most part, we are going to be stuck with feel-good issues.

ASKMSNBC: frisseehair-guest says: I was wondering what the strategy was for Bush to play gospel music and use rap dancers yesterday. Do you think that he is too biased religiously towards Christianity?

Rich_Harwood: I think it was a ploy to minorities, and I think Bush needs to be careful about looking like he's pandering, or being false about what he's up to. I think it's enough to say what you believe, to demonstrate it, and to let people judge it for what it is.

ASKMSNBC: doo-guest says: The Democrats keep bringing up Vietnam and Cheney votes. Do you think this will backfire?

Rich_Harwood: Yes. Definitely. The candidate who wins this election will be the one who puts forth something constructive, no the candidate who keeps trying to drive up the negatives of his opponent.

ASKMSNBC: brian-guest says: Rich, don't you feel the American people deserve the right to hear from every candidate who has a mathematical chance of winning the election?

Rich_Harwood: I think the news media should cover these other candidates, from Ralph Nader to Pat Buchanan, because they are raising issues that we need to deal with, and I think it can only benefit the country to air out those issues we need to address.

ASKMSNBC: frisseehair-guest says: Is it fair to say that Bush religious beliefs are a bit too upfront? As a Jewish person, do I really need gospel music during the convention??

ASKMSNBC: orionwest-guest says: Kansas Board of Education has eliminated scientific theory in favor of Creationism is this the idea of education Republicans have for the rest of the country

MSNBC-Will: Lots of religion questions

Rich_Harwood: I think again, the issue here is whether or not Bush's religious beliefs inform his ability to lead and govern, not whether someone can wear their religion on their sleeve, and they need to walk a very fine line on that. But I will say that too often we try to strip our religious beliefs out of our public thinking, and by doing so we can strip away meaning about what we are up to.

ASKMSNBC: Unknown-guest says: Do you think that last night's program had "traction" with the American People?

Rich_Harwood: I think it could. I think the storyline of this campaign will have to unfold for Americans before they reach firm judgements about what they think of either of these men.

MSNBC-Will: With all this advance technology and computers...donĂ­t you think it's time to get rid of the electorial college?...let every vote count

Rich_Harwood: I'm not sure. The Electoral College plays an important role in making sure the country balances out, and for the most part, our voting and I think in almost every campaign in the end reflected who actually sat in the White House.

ASKMSNBC: brian-guest says: Rich, don't forget about Harry Browne of the Libertarian party. After all, the Libertarian Party is the third largest.

Rich_Harwood: I said from Pat Buchanan to Ralph Nader and I would say everyone in between and beyond them!

ASKMSNBC: doo-guest says: Do you think that it is impossible for Bush and Republicans to embrace minorities? And for them to embrace the Republican party? Absolutely not. I think the Democrats for a very long time have taken the minority vote almost for granted, and many people in this country, not just minorities, are searching for a party they believe in and can support, and that means everybody.

ASKMSNBC: doo-guest says: Do you believe that in order to combat Democrat attack ads that the Republicans should do the same?

Rich_Harwood: No. I think that the Republicans, that both parties, should run ads that contrast records, that put each other on the spot, but this tit for tat will only make people believe that all politicians are worthless, someone needs to stand up and show there is a difference.

ASKMSNBC: mari_-guest says: How much effect do you think the conventions will have on voters, in terms of making up their minds?

Rich_Harwood: More than people think. I think these conventions will tell us a lot about both these men, and their parties, and what they stand for, especially when we gauge how they stick to their beliefs over the course of the campaign. I don't think the time has come to end political conventions, I think we should be paying attention to them.

ASKMSNBC: Acorn-guest says: Do you think they should have better music , then they did last night?

MSNBC-Will: Do they usually have this much music?

MSNBC-Will: Conventions I mean

Rich_Harwood: I think increasingly these are turning into entertainment shows, which I think is a mistake. Music can play an important role in conveying someone's beliefs and aspirations and it should be used in those ways, but to put on a show, let's leave that to other television programs. I think it's because those folks who work in politics have so totally blurred the line between reality and fiction

MSNBC-Will: Are they making up for an otherwise dull season

Rich_Harwood: that they have lost site of what is valuable and important, and they should check themselves at the door.

ASKMSNBC: UMCRevMom-guest says: What do you think of Cspan.. keeping track of time networks are spending on convention? Koppel last nite criticized media for loosing their role

Rich_Harwood: I don't know if they need to keep track of the time that the networks are spending, that seems to be a silly gimmick, everyone knows how much time the networks are spending on the convention. If they believe time is a legitimate issue to discuss so be it, but knock off the gimmick.

ASKMSNBC: TN_Volunteer-guest says: I think if the Convention continues as last night Gore may be in Trouble

Rich_Harwood: I happen to think they are putting forth ideas that will be of interest to folks, whether or not I personally agree with them. I think the Democrats have to start articulating their vision for this country, and not just driving up Bush's negatives.

ASKMSNBC: Yvonne-guest says: don't trust him further than I can see him.All the rest is spin!spin!spin.Gen.Colin Powell was brave to tell theGOP exactly what is on his mind.Is the GOP really as united as it is pretending to be? We'' see.

Rich_Harwood: I agree, we'll see. Colin Powell walked into the lion's den, and to the extent that he could, put tough issues on the table. We can only hope and pray that the two nominees will have as much courage.

ASKMSNBC: independent-guest says: If Powell is the future of the GOP, then the DEM monopoly on minority and women voters will end, especiall hispanic and black voters politics as we no it will change it would be a DEmocratic nightmare?

Rich_Harwood: I don't think Powell is the future of the GOP, but more importantly, represents the future of what this country could be. The Democrats and Republicans should follow his lead.

ASKMSNBC: farce-guest says: How does gays in the military hurt our national security as the GOP states?

Rich_Harwood: I'm not sure. I don't know if they truly believe what they are saying, which I'd like to know more about if that's the case, or if they are simply using national security reasons to hide a certain kind of bias against folks. It's not clear to me. This issue is like some of the issues Colin Powell raised last night. We can all disagree on what needs to be done, but for God's sakes, we ought to at least debate it in open, and put forth the real reasons for what we believe what we do.

ASKMSNBC: IvyLeaguer-guest says: Why cant Cheney's deep ties to Reagan - Bush covert activity be reported by the media at large?

ASKMSNBC: UMCRevMom-guest says: Cheney is a serious man with integrity... that is enough for me :)

MSNBC-Will: Does one answer the other?

Rich_Harwood: I think what I'm hearing is that people feel both ways about Dick Cheney simultaneously, and that makes sense. They want to know what he did, and why, but their sense of his integrity may override things that he did at a different point in time, it just goes to show how much trust and character is one of the central issues of this campaign, at least with Cheney you probably get what you see.

ASKMSNBC: frisseehair-guest says: Where has Gore gone wrong that people are saying he has no chance? Overall? What's your opinion, if you agree with this?

Rich_Harwood: He still definitely has a chance, it's way too early to write anyone off, he is going wrong, I believe, in that he is not following his heart or his beliefs, but is casting everything he says in cautious terms so not to make a mistake. He ought to go back and read his book "Earth In The Balance" and reground himself in his own beliefs. And then let the chips fall where they may.

ASKMSNBC: Jorge-guest says: Rich why is clinton attacking Gw? GOP not attacking Dems? Does Bill Clinton EGO make it impossible for him to stay out of this? Rich_Harwood: Quite possibly!

MSNBC-Will: does Clinton have a responsibility to help Gore any way he can?

Rich_Harwood: I don't think he necessarily has a responsibility, they may decide it's simply good politics, and if that's the case, so be it.

MSNBC-Will: Ok. Thank you very much Mr. Harwod for taking time for us today. Any comments on what to look for tonight?

Rich_Harwood: I'm hoping we'll see tonight, John McCain put forth a point of view that is clear, and not stated in roundabout ways, so that it means something to all people, but that he puts forth what he and the nominee and the party believe, so that Americans can make up their own minds. Let's see what he does.

MSNBC-Will: Thanks again Mr. Harwood for taking time with us. We'll see you again tomorrow!

Thanks very much guys for all the great questions We'll have Mickey Kaus here in a little more than an hour. followed by Andrea Mitchell and John Hockenberry is sitting next to me pricing GOP official merchandise he'll be taking questions later for the webcast.

 

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.2.