Type size:   a   a   a      Print page      Email page
  • Liar, liar, pants on fire!

    Posted by Rich Harwood
    Sep 15, 2009
    Representative Joe Wilson calling President Barack Obama a “liar” during the president’s health care speech last week is a sign of a coming inflection point in U.S. politics and public life. But brace yourself, Wilson’s comment in only the tip of the iceberg. So be it, this inflection point can’t come soon enough. I think it’s all for the good.

    I watched President Obama’s speech on TV and was dumbfounded when I heard Representative Wilson call him a liar. Had I ever heard such a thing before? Did I hear what I think I heard? Indeed, even before his outburst, the noisy and rambunctious chamber sounded more like the British Parliament than the U.S. Congress. It felt like at any moment things could spiral out of control.

    But in people’s haste to condemn Wilson, we shouldn’t lose sight of a bigger issue. Wilson’s outburst is yet one more sign that our political discourse has run amuck, that it’s producing very little value for the American people or the country. The health care debate is anything but a debate – filled with endless mudslinging, demagoguery, innuendos, half-truths, and blind partisanship. Let’s be honest, these are coming from all political sides!

    I’ve watched the Sunday talk shows as senators and governors and others studiously tick off their talking points, slamming their opponent, but never joining the debate. They’ve become automatons, slinging rhetorical arrows at one another, seemingly devoid of any concern for the damage they do. I say “seemingly” because I actually believe many of these people (perhaps almost all) care deeply about the country, and would even like to see a health care solution as well as progress on other key issues.

    But for now things are spinning out of control and we’re headed for an inflection point, a crisis point that demands our attention, for the current course can no longer sustain itself. I’ve written about such inflections points before. It is at such places we can either choose to face up to the forces at work, and in doing so propel ourselves forward in new and productive ways, or try to diffuse such forces, even avoid or go around them.

    Wilson’s “liar” comment takes us yet another step closer to the edge of impropriety in our society, and our political leaders know that. And yet, just beneath the political maneuverings over whether he should go to the well of the House to apologize, or even be sanctioned, are more contentious and tough issues. Many people believe that Wilson’s outburst was a sign of racism. Whether or not it was, I feel, as many others have, a growing undercurrent of this discussion in recent months; only look at the Cambridge incident between the Harvard professor and the local police officer for yet another data point, and there are many others.

    Moreover, the anger we’ve seen in the town halls is not the ordinary stuff of such public sessions. I listened to a recent town hall held by Senator Mark Warner of Virginia and I was stunned by people’s treatment of him. He is a right-leaning Democrat, a legend in Virginia politics, known for his even-handedness, and a very decent man. One individual after another rose up to pull him down, shout over him, and even belittle him. I had to stop my car on the side of the road, listening in disbelief, utterly dismayed by what I heard. This can’t be what we want.

    But let’s be clear, there are real forces at work here in terms of our political discourse, and they are bringing things to a head. That’s my point. And when they do, you and I and others face a fundamental choice. Will we say, “Enough is enough,” or will we shake our heads in disappointment, only to walk away? Will we write letters to the editor, comment on blogs, and stand by political leaders like Senator Warner? Will there be an outcry for the president to “strike back against his enemies,” no matter the situation, or will we use this moment to encourage him and his Republican counterparts to demand better political discourse.

    One last point: at such an inflection point, the most courageous people are those who stand up and say, “We must go in a different direction, let’s go.” They are the ones who help to set out and create new conditions. They are the ones who choose not to cast aspersions and half-truths, but to clarify and connect. They are the ones who, when people yell, “Liar, liar, pants on fire!” rise and say, “You’re wrong; there is no place for schoolyard antics here.”
        
  • Re:
    Feb 12, 2010 | hotel tuerkei 
    News Time,destroy word deal talk mind retain available external number reasonable mark island history question flat sea member catch programme progress organise determine need ticket equipment audience anybody need winner watch contact discuss late law green gentleman nor problem common entitle concept either ticket product best cross forget active state wood plate cross whom fruit investigation order afraid succeed release silence collection bottom journey food outcome male rather lean order song loan pull exercise instance attempt suddenly disease route become according instead welfare discipline sound error traffic associate factor charge him
  • Re:
    Jan 12, 2010 | buy databases 
    Sum Green,god pick speak weekend chemical suddenly usual city notion contribute land lovely imagine mistake band morning via group die year circumstance transfer finger definition settlement somewhat keep boat against promise initial application identify climb settle anyway about affect agency editor pretty as human advise speak mountain unit police amongst act wave row advice excellent after successful pressure sort battle meal military conclude protection soon person modern they music attitude walk influence shake release contract intention release sing item request culture border when area touch guide deep previous
  • Sept. 11, 2001
    Sep 22, 2009 | Nayda Veeman 
    What I struggle to understand is what desperation would cause men to do this to others. What can we do to build understanding between different peoples?
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 17, 2009 | Robin Rudd 
    I did send Rep. Wilson an email last week. I talked about the value of respecting the dignity of every human being and that in his interuption; he did not. I am preparing a note to my Representative, Chris Van Hollen. I have fears for our president's safety amid this escalated rhetoric and behavior. I am trying to overcome those fears with constructive action. Our president discourages fear and encourages that kind of action.
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 17, 2009 | Alice Cochran 
    Here is a letter I wrote to the editor of the Independent Journal newspaper in Marin County California (printed today, 9-16-09). I agree that we need to rise up against the rudeness and disrespect of elected officials and fellow citizens. I urge others to write to their papers and politicians.

    Rules for Order

    Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina said he had a "town-hall moment" when he shouted "you lie" at President Barack Obama during the president's nationally televised speech to Congress.

    Really. What does it say about the nature of public debate this country when town hall meetings are referred to as an excuse for public rudeness and disrespect of our president? When did outrageous public behavior become acceptable at town hall meetings?

    Recent town hall meetings, seen around the world, have been examples of a deterioration in civil society and open discourse in the democratic process of this country. Politicians dread them because they are a free-for-all with no consequences for rudeness, disrespectful outbursts and abusive verbal behavior. This has gone too far!

    What if those attending these meetings would have to follow some fair "courtesy guidelines" in order to be given an opportunity to speak (otherwise the microphone and cameras would be turned off)? Here are a few possibilities:

    - Express your opinion freely, but without demeaning others whose opinions differ. - Speak in a tone of voice (not shouting) that is respectful of others, and in a way you would want others to speak to you (not accusing or attacking). - Speak only for the agreed upon number of minutes before sitting down. - Clap, if you wish, to express your suppo

    I believe there is hope of restoring respectful behavior and decorum to public town hall meetings, if concerned politicians and citizens would take a stand against rudeness. However without consequences, we will continue to see the same behavior.

    Alice Cochran, author of "Roberta's Rules of Order," San Rafael
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 16, 2009 | Herb 
    Aren"t we already at the inflection point when people believe they have license for these outbursts and they look to our history as an American polity to support their actions? Isn't it time for us to ask "what sort of community we want to live in?" Even our so-called intellectuals explain recent behavior saying "people are angry" or "people are afraid of change". Weren't we told years ago that no one can make you angry or afraid? You have the capacity to decide how you will respond to the world around you. The community I want to live in sees a space between the match and the fuse and fills it first with a little humility and second with respect for others. Only then will a healthy exchange be possible
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 16, 2009 | Carlton Sears 
    These are wonderful points. They provide me inspiration for a meeting in about 20 minutes in which I need to help the staff maintain a sense of hope in a very difficult time.
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 16, 2009 | Michelle 
    I share your sentiments whole heartedly. I am dismayed by the anger and hostile outbursts that have been so common in this healthcare debate. Yet, I think it's more important to understand what's fueling this anger than to simply condemn the childish outbursts. It's almost as if we're saying, "If you can't say anything nice, then don't say anything at all." As ugly as it is, I want to know where this intensity is coming from, because if we dismiss it is only likely to go underground and grow in more dangerous ways. If we truly value discourse, I think we owe to ourselve to dig deeper and find enough compassion to respond with genuine inquiry and openness to those who challenge us with childish ways. Unless we are willing to get our hands dirty and really hear what people think, we will only have polite "civil" discourse without real change that requires some discomfort. I think Obama does this very well and is a model for all of us to engage with our fellow human being and not walk away no matter how we might feel about them in the moment.
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 16, 2009 | Rich Harwood 
    Eric, I'm glad you made your comment AND identified yourself as a 'conservative.' Too often even this discussion becomes mired down in partisan politics. And yet, as you've suggested, this is not a Democrat/Republican issue, or liberal/conservative -- but an issue about the health of our politics and public life which transcends all boundary lines. Thanks again.
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 15, 2009 | Eric 
    I'm actually quite pained by the divide in our parties. I can't believe the vote was along party lines. I consider myself a conservative and I consider Wilson's approach wrong. We need to do better than this.
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 15, 2009 | Rich Harwood 
    Laura, Glad to hear you're engaging your students on this. One way to help your students with their parents is to teach them questions to ask, such as: Why do you say that? Or, I wonder what someone who holds a different opinion would say -- what do you think? Or, what do you think we need to do to get a solution on this issue? I'm sure you have your own questions and ideas... but I think we all need to learn how to 'create' discussions, even when we are pushing our own point of view.

    I once did a study in which the final report was entitled, "Will Any Kind of Talk Do?" It's still one of my all-time favorites. We looked at when and why people move from private to public conversations, and what often prevents them from doing so. In short, people feared that no one would listen to them and/or that they would offend someone else. Your students -- indeed, all of us -- need to learn ways to engage on touchy, heated, or controversial issues. I think one of the best ways is to ask questions that create an invitation, or entreaty, to others, and which show that you are taking them and the topic at hand seriously -- and that you won't simply be bowled over.

    Let me know your thoughts and how your work with your students goes. Thanks again for your comment!
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 15, 2009 | Laura Love 
    I'd like to help lead HS-age students in the right direction--towards the ability to discuss opinions while maintaining integrity (and respecting others' dignity). As a HS principal, I'll share the blog with teachers in order to do this.

    My concern is how we can get the message across to students whose parents are behaving in the same ways as the Joe Wilsons? If educators "put parents' behaviors down" we cannot win the students' respect.

    Suggestions?
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 15, 2009 | Susan Carlson 
    I couldn't agree with you more. In fact, I have wondered why learned policy communicators haven't tried to use public engagement and conflict resolution strategies in these town hall meetings. So far, these sessions have been ample evidence of the need for training and learning how to tackle controversial issues to better the common good. I am heading up a statewide effort to reform school finance and watching and learning from the public debate on healthcare. the issues are complex, affect everyone, represent change and cause fear. I hope I learn the right lessons.
  • Re: Liar, liar, pants on fire!
    Sep 15, 2009 | Mark McLeod 
    How do I learn more about "the inflection point?" I liked this discussion of the "non-debate."
Username

Password

    Forgot your password?

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

MAKE HOPE REAL

In Make Hope Real, Rich Harwood outlines the five key factors to building healthy communities and a more robust public life.

Get a free copy >>

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.5.