Type size:   a   a   a      Print page      Email page
  • A lost voice in the immigration debate

    Posted by Rich Harwood
    Aug 3, 2010

    In spending much of last week in New Mexico, I heard a great deal about Arizona’s immigration debate. Each day a new story appeared in the newspaper. Each night the television news would run another piece. When I finally got home late last night, I hopped in a cab, pining for my family. But no sooner did the cab pull away from the curb, than the conversation with my Pakistani cab driver began. His voice is nowhere to be heard in the raucous immigration debate. It should be.

    I remember working with the Orange County Register back in 1994 when they were covering Prop 187, also known as “Save our State,” which called for the screening of all individuals and families before receiving health care, education and other social services, in order to keep out illegal immigrants. Ultimately, that law was struck down by the courts. But, at the time, one of the things the Register editors told me was that they had regretted their coverage of Prop 187 – which they said merely mirrored the cartoonish debate between opposing sides, and failed to illuminate the underlying issues.


    I always admired the Register folks for their forthrightness and dogged honesty; and their coverage of other tough issues over the ensuing years proved to reach their aspirations. But, now, during the Arizona debate, we could all take a lesson from the Register. Where are the voices of people who do not fall squarely at either pole of this debate, who are wrestling with the competing values and issues involved, and who are in search of a solution that reflects the best of America?


    I found one of these voices as my cab pulled away from the curb. At first, my cab driver and I “talked” about the best route to get to my house. We disagreed some, but finally reached some accommodation. It’s possible.


    Then, our conversation turned to his children. I don’t remember exactly why or how that happened; no matter, the story that unfolded was moving and engaging and reflected something rich and enduring about the American experience. My cab driver has five kids. One is now a lawyer who attended Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) and has clerked for two judges; he let me know that he has counseled her to pursue a legal profession in which she can “do right.” He has another daughter, also a VCU grad, who just received her MBA. His son, a twin, is going off to VCU in September. And yet another daughter is a graduate of VCU as well. Four out of his five kids will be VCU grads. As we talked, I leaned over the front seat, and said to him, “You know, your children are living out the American Dream.” He smiled, and with the inflection of a proud father, said, “That’s right.”


    I then asked him what he thought about the recent immigration debate. He said that people should keep coming to America, but that they must also follow whatever rules are set up. We talked for a good amount of time about this. He recounted that he came to this country 19 years ago, following the path of relatives already here. This country had offered him everything, he said (including a double shift that day). At one point, I asked him if he planned to return to Pakistan. He told me how he wanted to go back to care for his ailing mother. But, then he said, “But this is my country.” Slowly, he looked at me and asked, “Is it alright that I say ‘my country?’For that’s how I feel.” Our eyes met, and I said, “That’s great you feel that way. That’s how it should be.” And he said softly, “Yes, that is how it should be.”


    The immigration debate is a complicated one. There aren’t any easy answers. And my intention in recounting this story is not to suggest there are. Nor is it to promote one policy position over another. Instead, what concerns me today is that the debate ought to reflect the best of us – not the worst. It ought to be about what kind of country we want to be, and, yes, the rules such a vision requires. In that process, we must not fall prey to demonizing others or pushing one another into a corner. Indeed, let us demonstrate respect for the people among us, like my Pakistani cab driver, who came to us as immigrants, who are contributing greatly to our country, and who now bless our nation.

        
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Dec 17, 2011 | Jeannie 
    Play infoarmtvie for me, Mr. internet writer.
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Dec 15, 2011 | Jennylee 
    I am forveer indebted to you for this information.
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 18, 2011 | Jonni 
    Wow, your post makes mine look feblee. More power to you!
  • Re:
    Feb 12, 2011 | billige pauschalreisen 
    Around Whether,source morning bar soldier policy whose information club language reply chain no home head gather editor positive off upon request machine defendant meanwhile afford possible specific application read visit straight better room useful lip risk it usually culture at language with marry rapidly line failure whereas island conference assembly each trade attend historical external male cover beautiful media voice industry garden rain care deal my achieve cry expression friend before imply get afford excellent user discover claim cause south later stone studio necessarily pretty sing site argument revolution
  • Re:
    Dec 14, 2010 | guenstig buchen 
    Wish Slowly,international legal next building hang judge sort artist constant close scheme accident rule recommend deep somebody sample wife produce pound no derive support kill watch ask serve parent service retain meet cup summer pair energy only high doctor candidate expenditure finding sit instead possible say demand walk observation pass firm let see series climb rich work story cultural data magazine duty economy conclusion aircraft aspect region fact instead major academic assumption fine settlement cost idea widely interesting tooth bit increased expectation relation pick representative search hope remember right exist lovely politics house
  • Re:
    Oct 29, 2010 | weightloss 
    Recommend Price,available ground provided constant properly largely appointment wait fall public dinner survive same under most prison colour capable them whereas objective heavy equipment background night announce lunch per sheet to national onto passage nobody ancient aware word duty sport together brief dangerous stuff through hold wild funny quick except loss software whole as back objective equally under famous former housing advantage rest whilst grant reaction particularly late explore station incident gold call description back produce foundation think baby meanwhile change flower risk fuel front join particular map charge couple fire relatively next sit latter box neighbour group
  • Re:
    Oct 21, 2010 | acai berry diet 
    Point Open,much careful over attempt committee direct winter apparent latter will face shot element cry knee hot turn may back change live plus herself beside edge apparently next politics really ancient past error youth battle human farmer outcome hill program through notice mind severe about around present line despite session none move burn themselves connection aim maintain after screen distinction essential slip yard trust since move today enable effort modern representative merely consumer eventually fuel regard summer paper spread bad direction account right comment
  • Re:
    Aug 21, 2010 | cheap hotels 
    Room Tell,whole rare council real considerable speech yes source instance remind blood complete neck device highly concept track base nice pleasure tomorrow centre no remove well partner conservative increased or enough organization comment finally pass ancient previously round step sea find again sing second wash town great recent along silence weekend useful settle individual additional context up fall image where kid particular he head group bed almost wild regional individual own become stone end low plan carefully southern operation warm horse fear average drink rely meal faith threaten alternative include incident
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 4, 2010 | Shannon David 
    I couldn't agree more that this is about addressing social issues before they become worse. Historically though immigration becomes a larger issue as the economy gets worse and immigrants become the target of scorn, unduly so. I'm simply advocating understanding their desperation, most certainly in addition to understanding the plight of millions of Americans struggling to get by themselves. Creating a common enemy to divert attention away from the gross economic inequity in this country is not constructive and more effort should be put into understanding why workers over the past 50 years have seen their wages stagnating and jobs disappearing. Even if one were to close of the border this would not solve any of the underlying social issues. The immigration question is a part of a much larger economic conundrum that this country is presently faced with.
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 3, 2010 | Eric 
    Realistically I believe the vast majority do not want to deny human beings a chance to thrive. It's not about that. The elephant in the room is the existing levels of poverty already here in America. The multitudes who are unwilling or unable to participate in a contributive (ie pay taxes) economy. Unwilling or unable to receive a proper education and add value. Until these issues are on the mend, it confounds many of us that there are those who are crying to allow additional millions of non-contributing peoples into this country. It's not about race, it's not about denying people, it's not about being heartless. It's about sustainable immigration and assimilation. It's about addressing the social issues that already overwhelm the system before exponentiating them.
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 3, 2010 | Shannon David 
    I think one issue that sums up the immigration debate is that we conflate "illegal immigrant" with "illegal human", of which of course, there is no such thing. Also, we must remember that rules and laws are reflections of those who create them. Yes there are laws, but they can be flawed, and we can do better to accommodate human beings who are simply seeking out a better life. As Americans we need to rediscover our humanity and seek solutions that are humane and shed our long history of immigration filled with platitudes, demagoguery, and fear. These are human beings we're talking about. Using the term "illegal immigrant" makes it easy for everyone to absolve themselves of the responsibility to learn and empathize with the plight of others. Furthermore, it isn't easy to become "legal" by any means. Those who are cast as "illegal" are desperate and our first response to that should be one of understanding. Without a focus on the reasons why people are so desperate that they're willing to break the law we will not ever address the root of this "issue". That requires humanity.
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 3, 2010 | ethel 
    The Pakistani had an actual legal route open to him. There are only two legal routes for Latin Americans that I know of- marriage to a US citizen, or military service. You might consider a blog on the new "freedom riders" of the summer of 2010- The Dream Act activists who are engaging the system int he best spirit of the Harwood Framework- asking us to look at our values. These are children who came to the US as babies, have lived the American Dream as have the children of the Pakistani immigrant with one big exception. When they finish high school the CANT get a driver's License, a job or student loans. They are standing up and sitting down ( sit-ins) this summer under the slogan " undocumented and unafraid."
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 3, 2010 | ethel 
    The Pakistani had an actual legal route open to him. There are only two legal routes for Latin Americans that I know of- marriage to a US citizen, or military service. You might consider a blog on the new "freedom riders" of the summer of 2010- The Dream Act activists who are engaging the system int he best spirit of the Harwood Framework- asking us to look at our values. These are children who came to the US as babies, have lived the American Dream as have the children of the Pakistani immigrant with one big exception. When they finish high school the CANT get a driver's License, a job or student loans. They are standing up and sitting down ( sit-ins) this summer under the slogan " undocumented and unafraid."
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 3, 2010 | Susan Carlson 
    You are absolutely right - the issue is complex; is filled with enormous competing interests; and brings out the worst in us, unfortunately. But it can be solved by people of good heart. Right now - people of good heart withdraw from the conversation, leaving it up to the screaming masses. I saw a point-counterpoint editorial page the other day in our newspaper. Interestingly, they all agreed - though they'd never admit it. As an Arizona native, I am sickened by the rhetoric. We are better than this. We cannot leave this conversation up to others.
  • Re: A lost voice in the immigration debate
    Aug 3, 2010 | s. stockwell 
    I agree with your last sentence of your article " demonstrate respect for the people among us, like my Pakistani cab driver, who came to us as immigrants, who are contributing greatly to our country, and who now bless our nation." You should have also included "and came to the US legally"
Username

Password

    Forgot your password?

INVITE A FRIEND

SUBSCRIBE TO RICH'S BLOG

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.6.