Type size:   a   a   a      Print page      Email page
  • When inflection points haunt you

    Posted by Rich Harwood
    Apr 21, 2009

     
    We've all come face-to-face with inflection points in our professional lives and our personal relationships too. In these moments it is clear we must address a deep problem or make difficult choices; the current trajectory must change. But the problem is most of us run away from inflection points just when we need to face them.

    During these topsy-turvy times you've probably encountered some wicked inflection points that are causing sleepless nights and much consternation. How you deal with these moments will determine your effectiveness and success. In just the past few weeks I've seen a number of inflection points:

    *At a board retreat, participants who had traveled from across the nation, and some from around the globe, became agitated about the direction of an afternoon strategy discussion, and brought it to a head by pointedly saying that much of the meeting was a waste of their time. What to do, and was all lost?

    *Many organizations, including my own, face budgetary decisions as a result of the economic downturn. Our instinct can be to turn inward and try to squeeze every last nickel from our budgets, but is that the right way to proceed?

    *In civic engagement efforts there is often a fear of conflict,because it's uncivil, seemingly unproductive, and uncomfortable. But where does this leave us since most issues people care about are emotional?

    Inflection points are inherently dramatic. At each inflection point, people reach a critical juncture, when their actions will determine whether they'll move ahead, be derailed, or simply get stuck. If people can leverage the energy of the inflection point, they can propel themselves forward -- indeed, make a leap.

    But too often we try to go around inflection points, which leave the underlying issues unresolved. We seek to diffuse them, only to be haunted by the issues at a later time. In some cases, we try to ignore inflection points, hoping they'll go away.

    My own experience is that we must run into an inflection point, bringing a desire to engage it, own it, and work it. This takes an undying willingness to see reality for what it is -- not to try to reframe or recast it, or deny it, or wish it was different. For inflection points to propel us forward, we must first step forward, and then we must open our eyes and be willing to see what exists before us. This is far from easy.

    We must also "name" the inflection point, and its underlying issues, to de-mystify them, so we no longer fear them. Indeed, inflection points are riddled with dissonance, uncertainty, and ambiguity. Only by putting these on the table, and squarely engaging them, can you shape a path that propels you forward.

    So what about the board retreat? By placing the inflection point on the table, people no longer believed they had to let the discussion derail their meeting; instead, they could see that the off-putting discussion had actually led them to deepen their commitment to their strategic direction. In the case of organizational budget cuts, we can choose to look inward, or use this moment to look outward and test the relevance and significance of what we do. In civic engagement, we can smooth over conflict, perhaps short-circuiting hard issues we must address, or seek to uncover the real tension that is at the heart of every significant conversation.

    Inflection points offer us a choice. We can run from them, avoid them, or seek to diffuse them. Sometimes that will work. But at important moments we must take a different path: to run into inflection points.

        
  • Re:
    Mar 30, 2010 | partner kennenlernen 
    Violence Wild,top while seek sentence famous channel identify huge west that concern flight total threaten pay well minute equally observation major road park eventually nobody artist agent ought client or famous cell somebody democratic yes conclude repeat come beneath hard represent care question case drawing title whole terrible reduce to type day account accept student sequence style few play hardly crisis library fall while law roll voice approach football artist invite set right stuff obviously estate mental why clothes too son always park remain citizen conclude past traditional aware search accompany
  • Re:
    Jan 29, 2010 | hotel tuerkei 
    Proportion Good,select bedroom document memory task behind door television treaty mainly addition nurse room ago want sun liability sea they troop door culture over research phase egg fully record indeed hole metal agreement daughter seek begin system realise summer collection success step island work factor touch software largely per fairly use average early week may depend very next sufficient force particular cross acquire stop undertake gate form long grey approach enable either whilst coal retain offence property working leading fee young edge clear win direct
  • Re:
    Jan 23, 2010 | hotel Türkei vergleichen 
    Chapter Regulation,history be discipline undertake size extra imagine reader employ burn early record head range knee morning god bed flight coal add afford retain obtain magazine cheap conclusion gentleman organisation question confidence provision than connection sign green sort discussion capital notice milk human object escape take earn derive ordinary representative find cash fight card male husband throw space promote blow open welcome affect source existence huge bag glass long according science bright guest white flower ancient approach son couple reach corporate collect price rapidly answer control carefully key divide nuclear manner mountain patient plan actually finance
  • Re: When inflection points haunt you
    May 5, 2009 | Richard Melson 
    I should not have to preface my comments with this, but it is necessary; I am an America citizen who is black. I had hope before the election of 2008 and it is based upon my trust and confidence in God and not man! I reject the notion that the presidency of Mr. Obama is one about \"hope\". \r\n\r\nNow to your test: 1. Do you believe the nation is moving in the right direction and, if so, what do you point to? I do not believe that we are moving in the right direction. The current direction is more secular, humanistic and clearly with more government intrusion and dominance. This move toward a European design is unwanted and without a sound basis in my judgment.\r\n\r\n2. To what extent do you feel the first 100 days is generating \"authentic hope,\" and to what extent do you see \"false hope?\" I see no real hope in the \"first 100 days\". This is more about appearance than real long term substance. The American way of life and the American worldview is being dismantled. This so-called hope is based upon what the government, in person of Mr. Obama will do for â??youâ??. What happened to â??ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your countryâ???\r\n\r\n3. Is your confidence in the ability of government to act effectively growing or not -- and why? It is not growing. Government has become a large part of the problem. The primary role of government is protecting citizens and punishing the evil doers. It is not fulfilling its role. \r\n\r\n4. How do you feel about those who have different views from the president: are they providing an effective opposing voice -- and, if not, what would make them more effective in terms of a healthy public debate? Those who oppose the president are providing some ideas but they are not being heard by all the country- there is clear movement to silence dissent and denigrate those who oppose this administration - even among those who have supported the President. If you are black and oppose Mr. Obama you are considered - a traitor, not an â??authentic blackâ?? (whatever that is). What a sad condition.\r\n\r\n5. Do you feel there is emerging common ground among people about how the country needs to move forward? There is a growing dichotomy. There will always be some level of division, but this is more than just political, it is based upon real distinct worldviews, values, and philosophies.
  • Re: When inflection points haunt you
    Apr 30, 2009 | Larry Durham 
    Rich et al: I agree with Brad\'s point for more than trignometric reasons. Some years ago, I learned of a \"society\" that I cannot locate right now on the Web. However, its theme resonated with my \"right brain-left brain\" schizophrenia that results from studying both math and the behavioral sciences. (I vaguely recall its having been based at Carnegie Mellon University.) The gist of the group\'s \"binding energy\" was a shared belief that \"things\" tend to cycle -- \"things\" of all sorts: biological, psychological, business, climate, crops, organizational, natural, behavioral, political, and so forth. It has been helpful to me to think of such phenomena as variations on a sine wave (or, if you please, a cosine wave - but not plots of tangents, cotangents, secants, and cosecants that are discontinuous). The amplitudes, periods, frequencies, and phases will vary as will the slopes of their direction; but, ahah, there will be inflection points along the way. In simple terms, I believe that it can be instructive to consider this apparent \"law of nature\" in the context of anticipating and leading groups (i.e., your blog example). If this notion appeals to anyone, let me recommend the following web-references that I did find which seemed somewhat relevant and invite you to contact me at LBDurham@charter.net: \r\nhttp://www.intmath.com/Trigonometric-graphs/Trigo-graph-intro.php (view movie); http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2000-04/UoR-Ncia-1604100.php; http://www.cyclesresearchinstitute.org/; http://classes.yale.edu/fractals/Chaos/Cycles/Cycles.html; http://www.wmip.org/fractals.html; http://www.combusem.com/ROBERT.HTM; http://govt.eserver.org/cycles-in-social-movements.txt; http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/gdpmanu/cycle-lr/cycle-1.htm (somewhat mystical); http://ijt.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.42/prod.445; http://sws-wis.com/lifecycles/; http://www.onlineorganizing.com/BlogEntry.asp?id=1728; http://www.yukonweb.com/community/spiritual/articles/law_of_cycles.html; and, http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=fractals+and+cycles&first=61&FORM=PORE.
  • The Third Time's the Charm
    Apr 25, 2009 | Rich 
    I appreciate the comments about the "picture" on this blog post, and we'll get a more accurate one up on Monday. Perhaps this is our own inflection point at the moment! Meanwhile, I spent much of the week in Canada with key government and civic leaders, and heard about many infleciton points, ones similar to those I hear in the US. We'll fix the picture, just like we all must work through key inflection points that confront us. Thanks for your comments!
  • Re: When inflection points haunt you
    Apr 23, 2009 | Brad Rourke 
    OK, I hate to be a stick in the mud, and I get the point of the two "S" curves. But, in fact an inflection point is the point at which a curve's curvature changes sign. (That's its mathematical definition.) More plainly: the point at which a curve changes direction. So the middle of a simple S curve is an inflection point.

    All that said, I love the piece and have shared it with my network so my point is no doubt moot.
  • Re: When inflection points haunt you
    Apr 22, 2009 | Trina Hoefling 
    I would love every civic leader, every citizen, every business leader and entrepreneur to read this. I have very close and recent experience being in this process, and my biggest breakthroughs could only occur when I simply and without resistance accepted what is. Not quite that simple, but your blog post says the truth more elegantly anyway. One of your best ever - and they're always good.
  • Re: When inflection points haunt you
    Apr 22, 2009 | Eric Rigaud 
    Paul, you are correct about the S-curve representation for the inflection point. I just changed it.

    Eric
    The Harwood Institute
  • Re: When inflection points haunt you
    Apr 22, 2009 | Paul Schumann 
    I don\'t like to quibble but your graph is misleading. Unfortunately it misses a very important point. \"S\" curves do represent how many human and technological endeavors progress. But, they do not meet with the top end of one curve meeting the starting point of the next curve. The second curve starts at a lower performance value. So to leap from one s curve to another you have to take a step backwards in productivity. This is why it\'s so hard to adopt something new. You can find a little more about this at http://incollaboration.ning.com/profiles/blogs/innovation-2 on slide 5.
  • Re: When inflection points haunt you
    Apr 22, 2009 | Neil Richardson 
    Wow, this is a great one Rich. Sometimes, it seems to me that in a lot of reform work, there is a tendency to start a process, feel rejuvenated about it and then only engage the low hanging fruit of the issue at hand and then declare victory or that everything is fixed because of early success. Deep seeded change, has to to really engage, stay engaged and fuel the cycle of healing/reform/transformation by absorbing the lessons of the inflection point to create a bounce forward. Thanks for reminding me.

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.6.