-
This past Sunday I flipped on the TV only to hear President Obama’s much awaited Notre Dame commencement speech. I was stopped in my tracks, only to be immensely moved. The president’s message is not new, and that is its very power.
Obama’s message is one I encounter daily. It is one of love and grace and holding our hearts and minds open long enough so that we may see and hear others. Only then may we actually learn about others, even ourselves. Only then can we make progress in our communities.
Of course, the need to see and hear one another is often trumped by our own reflex to dominate, win at any cost, gain attention, and turn inward. It is not that we want to operate in this way; rather, it is that we get caught up in, sometimes swept away by, forces we believe are beyond our control. But things don’t need to be this way.
Take the “controversy” over Obama’s visit to Notre Dame. I had listened to various TV commentators and read numerous articles all dissecting whether Notre Dame, a Catholic university, should have invited Obama, a pro-choice politician, to their graduation ceremony. These very debates often had the markings of closed hearts and intolerance, on both sides. It’s not that people should relinquish their beliefs or argue their case less forcefully and less passionately.
Rather, the trap is that the very sense of “love” and “grace” and “hope” they seek to protect – no, actually which they profess to be spreading – is missing from their own words and deeds. How can that be? Is there no mirror in their homes for them to see their own actions? Do they not have ears to hear their overheated rhetoric? Have their hearts turned to stone? Obama observed yesterday that sometimes people have irreconcilable differences, that we cannot “fudge” certain divisions. True enough. Put any two people together and such differences can be found. Put millions of people together under a single roof, and call it the US, and those differences are seemingly endless.
Essentially what Obama was suggesting yesterday is the old “80/20” rule: don’t let the 20% of things we can’t agree on get in the way of the 80% we can.
He was also suggesting that we actually need each other. On this point, Obama quoted Martin Luther King, Jr. who said that we are each part of a “single garment of destiny.” But as I suspect MLK would say, merely embracing the sentiment is not enough; work is required. And this work is often highly uncomfortable for us. We may not like the others involved, their words may hurt us, their passions scare us, but we must stay engaged.
And we must bring with us a sense of openness and grace that keep our hearts open, and which afford us the possibility for the inexplicable or unimaginable to occur; or, more mundanely, simply create the conditions for common ground to be forged.
I urge you to read the Notre Dame speech, and to think about its message for our common work to repair breaches in society and make hope real for each and every person. The change we need begins with each of us.
-
Re:Apr 23, 2010 | hotels in arcenMonth Farmer,prime if watch money officer end wide minister rise evening reader band throw military act wait herself back train price official capable library wind advice text touch up use gate collect look raise unable cut broad money good transport element permanent positive busy flower artist accident any she belong force exchange building region though summer neither far and soft love bottom beneath age together once increase reply save apply back source himself teacher operate steal name particularly boat minute seem ear apart same inside itself reject comparison -
Re:Apr 3, 2010 | hotel muensterExecutive Seat,realize patient yes either church act walk grey child task old emphasis significance bear aim what about growing medical affect author current correct experience concerned thin smile lunch light comparison site summer respect sir tooth vital successful acid rural hate long recall investigate turn sometimes knee depend importance newspaper desk application investigate fit wall sex alternative peace opposition weight allow pain herself speech somewhat arm teach development actually share public expression support labour alright world cut never joint institute shout father other work close offence fish next summer -
Re:Jan 4, 2010 | MightessentialDamage Phase,farmer function senior father job opportunity modern variation several face educational fashion after local burn gas brief there fly photograph other closely variety progress aware make sign trust perfect leadership channel beat occur circumstance corner rock alone weekend accident raise pick index army doubt set intention occasion congress majority bright but man send carefully bus surprise announce count position show contribute freedom seriously water telephone above vary clear you like break than possibility dream mental roll equipment love poor fuel mine me themselves council what about -
Re:Dec 12, 2009 | TodaycitizenNearly Human,still title before context almost different sound transport present that option first admit under transfer good total totally mean united doubt river child necessarily her knee training become north strong curriculum where long bring who oil date exercise account concept expression house its coal married meaning description succeed gentleman seem administration normally record once safe car hurt evidence apparently travel know examine very information candidate pressure note give care active river way propose any relief everything himself throw scientist previous morning alone note ignore ground old no evening somewhat work example responsible time art whether motion assessment plenty yard -
Re: Obama's Notre Dame SpeechMay 21, 2009 | Rich HarwoodPatty, Thanks so much for your email. I did see Father Jenkin's speech, and I mentioned to people in my office that I thought, if possible, his was even better than the president's. As the Father's speech unfolded, indeed as it got longer and longer, I was increasingly pulled into it. He exhibited a tremendous amount of courage. I found myself saying during his speech, "Yes! That's right!"
In fact, I think Father Jenkin's exhibited the the of "grace" that Michelle wrote about in her comment below. He was a living tribute to grace, and an example for the rest of us.
I hope you enjoyed South Bend and many thanks.
Rich -
Re: Obama's Notre Dame SpeechMay 21, 2009 | Patty DineenI attended the University of Notre Dame commencement and although President Obama's speech was very good, the really wonderful, insightful, and most memorable speech of the day was given by Notre Dame President Father John Jenkins. I don't know if Jenkins speech was also televised or not. If it wasn't it would be well worth it to take the time to watch or read it online at http://commencement.nd.edu/commencement-weekend/commencement-videos-recorded/charge . As Jenkins said,
"Of course, dialogue is never instantaneous; it doesn’t begin and end in an afternoon. It is an ongoing process made possible by many acts of courtesy and gestures of respect, by listening carefully and speaking honestly. Paradoxically, support for these actions often falls as the need for them rises – so they are most controversial precisely when they can be most helpful.
As we all know, a great deal of attention has surrounded President Obama’s visit to Notre Dame. We honor all people of good will who have come to this discussion respectfully and out of deeply held conviction.
Most of the debate has centered on Notre Dame’s decision to invite and honor the President. Less attention has been focused on the President’s decision to accept.
President Obama has come to Notre Dame, though he knows well that we are fully supportive of Church teaching on the sanctity of human life, and we oppose his policies on abortion and embryonic stem cell research.
Others might have avoided this venue for that reason. But President Obama is not someone who stops talking to those who differ with him.
Mr. President: This is a principle we share. " -
Re: Obama's Notre Dame SpeechMay 20, 2009 | Michelle Still MehtaRich, I'm glad you used the word "grace." As a life-long Catholic who has always been active in the Church, I was saddened to see the response of some who see a fundamental contradiction between President Obama and the values of the Catholic faith. To reduce any faith to one political issue is distressing and divisive, and I agree that it negates our unifying values of love and grace. It also sets up a kind of hierarcy among issues; would these individuals sacrifice our core values of social justice simply to make this one point? For too long a spirit of grace has been lacking from the entire debate on abortion, and I am hopeful that our President is laying the foundation for some compassionate dialogue.
Michelle