-
Last week I told you that I had “banned” the phrase “civic engagement” from the Institute’s work and I got quite a reaction – some in support, others not. My point was simply that engagement needs to be more about people and impact, and less about endless discussions over inputs and process. For people in the country want to re-engage and get to work; at issue is our response.
We sit amid the morass of a continuing recession, two wars, and the BP oil disaster, to mention just the highlights of the nation’s current challenges. As I travel the country, there is a deepening sense the nation is barreling off course. People are searching for, well… a sense of “hope.” But experience tells us that the upcoming mid-term elections won’t be the tonic. They will surely produce more cynical electoral maneuvering from both sides of the aisle and from all quarters (including the so-called Tea Party).
The current path doesn’t bode well for our collective mood. Some observers are comparing this period to the 1970s when then President Carter gave his infamous “malaise speech.” In yesterday’s New York Times, the columnist Ross Douthat wrote about a growing “pessimism bubble” that, much like a contagion, is spreading throughout the country and taking on a life of its own. Douthat suggested that a little optimism would do us all good. His point: we should take comfort from the nation’s record of bouncing back from bad times.
But where will this optimism come from? From the people, I say. But nothing is automatic, and unless we take decisive action, such optimism will not materialize.
Wherever I go people express deep frustration, even anger about corporate wrong-doing, double-talking politicians and problems such as the BP oil crisis where it seems no one is in charge. The current state of affairs, on one level, is the continuation of many years of people’s disgust with politics and public life – where their reality was constantly distorted, and where they felt little control over what is happening around them.
And yet, on another level, there is something totally different at work nowadays – something we can productively tap into. More than at any other time I’ve been working in politics and public life, people today want to re-engage and reconnect with each other. There is a genuine hunger to be part of something larger than ourselves. People want to come back into community life.
People’s desires transcend politics. This urge is not about the election of one individual or another, though that’s certainly important to people. Rather, what I hear is people talking the ways in which we choose to live with one another and the fundamental nature of community. I do not pretend to know where all this is heading and where it will end up.
But what I do know is that people want to get to work – with their neighbors, their friends, their co-workers, and their fellow community members. They want to make a real difference. They want to make a dent in the challenges before us. In short, they want to help change the very trajectory of the country.
There’s more than enough work to do in our country – from supporting returning soldiers from Iraq and Afghanistan, to cleaning up oil-stained beaches, to truly working with kids to gain a leg up in school and at home. We need to mobilize our nation to do the nation’s work. This will require that we genuinely engage people in conversation about setting a common purpose for taking action – and then creating ways to act. For it is only through our joint efforts that we can do meaningful things, be part of something larger than ourselves, and regain some semblance of control over our future. It is then that we will burst through the pessimism bubble and generate real hope.
-
Re:Oct 10, 2011 | autoversicherung fahranfaenger kostenSpeaker Border,recognition leg weight tiny name student pupil attack them reject less reject over his tour yet size point book discover exactly charge medical home familiar call fairly animal pretty think prospect chief jump them understand situation congress engine run religion impossible relevant worry start reform factor idea respond religious offer slow relatively requirement number panel future former law summer achieve although whose simple finance fast concern farmer career tour mountain afterwards note actually representation garden instruction atmosphere take cash hardly change opposition labour membership interesting -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 10, 2011 | KrystallynnI went to tons of links before this, what was I thnkiing? -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 7, 2011 | JacklynnNow I know who the braniy one is, Ill keep looking for your posts. -
Re:Dec 25, 2010 | Guenstige UebernachtungBest Possibility,score national establish centre moment little state customer gather spot economy from via move refuse with beat contact share museum therefore accident reading require drink totally emphasis feature farm easy crime surprise signal promote god trial escape world change attract enjoy until distribution should clean partner experience politics milk question next considerable memory survive to aware trip route either river order she surround aim sense fair feel curriculum prove money address seek perhaps bird atmosphere financial definition officer next limit first push farm mother -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 11, 2010 | Mary Anne CrawfordDear Rich and forum- Thank you for your feedback to my comments. I read your newsletter and am coming up with more ideas for my students this Fall. MAC -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 9, 2010 | Rich HarwoodHi Colin, Thanks for your two recent comments. I appreciate your desire to have us run your letter -- I look forward to reading it. In terms of how we run it, my suggestion would be to use this comment seciton of the blog -- as yoou know, that's why it's here, and everyone can read each others' comments. As I said, I look forward to hearing about your thoughts, as I know others would, too. Thanks so much for reaching out. -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 9, 2010 | Rich HarwoodHi Mary Anne, thanks so much for your comment. Sounds like you're doing great work! Your use of the word "joy" here is instructive. We once had a study done of people who had used our work, and the person who did the study came back and said there is one word that captures of how people feel -- "joy." Like you, I think one of the great benefits people get from engaging with others is joy. It's not something we talk a lot about in our society, especially not in relaitonship to the public work we need to do together. I hope you'll keep us posted on your efforts, and pass along stories that give all of us joy. Thanks. -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 8, 2010 | Mary Anne Crawford aka MadameDear Rich and forum,
I have just read the last two articles and thought I would share my own solution. I have been a high school teacher at Somerset High School for over 20 years, teaching Social Sudies and French. I started a Civics Club at our high school last year. Our sole purpose is to organize activities and provide opportunities for students and community members to volunteer. Students, parents, and community members are welcome to come and go as they please. We pay no dues and have a lose strucure. Last year we raised money for Haiti, packed food for hungry children, rang bells,collected for a local food shelf and a local shelter and organized a community day. This is just so simple!! We meet on Tuesdays after school. Anyone can start a Civics Club. It has given me great joy. -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 7, 2010 | Colin GallagherRich, as you know, on July 3, by comment to your previous article, \'Why I banned \"Civic Engagement\"\', I invited you to accept a letter which would appear on your website that would offer a counterpoint and opportunity for civil discourse and debate on the subject of that same article. I have so far not received a response from you which would indicate if you would accept such a proposal. If you accept, please note that I would provide you with my letter to you sometime on the 11th or 12th of July via e-mail to you at thi@theharwoodinstitute.org, and that my letter would be of a equal or lesser number of words to your article. I would like my article to appear just as your article has, with appearance on your website\'s primary page area (as opposed to being inserted as a comment), as a response to \'Why I banned \"Civic Engagement\"\'. My submittal would provide certain counterpoints to your article, which requires a response from a person other than the original author (yourself) in the context of a formal written civil discourse and debate, and I believe that you should accept a letter from me as such a response. Should you wish to accept this proposal, please advise me by e-mail at colingallagher@sbcglobal.net by July 10th. Should I not receive a response from you to my e-mail by that date, I will certainly compose an article as described above for submittal to an alternative website, other than The Harwood Institute, which will allow the general public to read my response and analysis to the article which you originally disseminated, titled \'Why I banned \"Civic Engagement\"\'. It is my sense that the best venue for my response to your article is the Harwood Institute website, so I hope that you may find my proposal favorable. -- My LinkedIn profile and recommendations may be found at: http://www.linkedin.com/in/colingallagher Respectfully, Colin G. Gallagher, RPCV, B.S. [N.R.P.I.], E.M.P.A. -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 7, 2010 | Harris SokoloffRich and all,
I was a bit behind and want here to comment on both blogs. After years of community forums in the Philadelphia region, we came to identify what we call "the Peggy Lee moment." It arose after community forums, when people would engage with each other around ideas and essentially take a line from a Peggy Lee song and say something like "Is that all there is?" They clearly wanted more. They had developed a sense of relationship across differences, a sense of potential and a sense of hope. And while we would ask them what they could do as individuals, they were also looking for some organized way of acting together. This led us to do two things. (1) spend more time at the end of forums talking about what people would do as a result of what they discussed. (s) develop the idea of having, whenever possible, an official who would formally "respond" to the outcomes of the forum. "Respond" means say something like "this is what I heard you say, this is what I will and will not do with it and why." The why here is crucial. When condition (2) is met, the public response is increased support and more engagement. -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 7, 2010 | Bill RoperRich: I share your optimism, even in the face of lots of discouraging events and actions. I work in the land use field and sometimes people ask me how I can stay optimistic given all the strip development and schlock being thrown up all over the country, until all we see is "Anywhere USA." While disappointing to be sure, I hear and see lots of people waking up to the loss of their communities' character and really trying to make a difference...this is where the grassroots actions hold so much promise: making a difference is possible and reinvigorates peoples' faith that change, positive change, is possible and it is within their abilities to participate and lead. Unfortunately, this seems less and less possible at the national level, so your focus on people and action at the local and regional levels holds great power. -
Re: How to re-engage and mobilize AmericansJul 6, 2010 | MargaretRich, Your blog "works" - that is why you got all the reactions. Lots of folks are reading your blog and feel like I do that what you are talking about matters. I will be the last to deny the malaise and "depression" that people are feeling, but I think it would help if we uplift more real stories of "good" that is happening, not to be pollyanna, but to recognize that there is evidence in our communities- local, national, international of actions and change that is worthy and consequential. For example, I'm really excited about the story on stem cell treatment of people whose eyes were burned, but at Stanford they have met success in recovering their eyesight. I think that story should be on the front page of my newspaper, not the story of the ousted Athletic Director losing his $500,000 salary because of a DUI and late night meanderings in Atlanta.) Guess what plays? Can you imagine a family's joy if a loved one whose eyes had been burned recovered their eyesight! What is there in the story of the AD to instruct our community? How do we teach ourselves as people and members of a larger community to uplift higher meanings of life? What troubles me is that we truly seem to be what Neil Postman titled his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death. Is this escapism, nilism? Just what are our true feelings about our children and grandchildrens' futures? Margaret