Beyond the Outrage: Turning Protest Into Positive Force for Change
Posted by
Rich Harwood
Jan 10, 2012
What happens after all the outrage?
In many ways the rapid
spread of the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street
movements is a healthy sign that people are not
mere spectators in the public square. Instead,
they are stepping forward to express what
matters most to them.
But outrage alone
will never be enough to create the kind of
society people want. It will not, by itself,
create more jobs, improve health care, or make
us safer. Nor does it build trust across fault
lines in society. It ultimately leaves people
and the country at loggerheads.
In my travels across
the nation, what's clear is that Americans are
yearning to come back into the public square.
They want to re-engage and re-connect with one
another, join together to make a difference,
and become a part of something larger than
themselves.
The question is how
to break down the silos, and temper the
shouting and name calling that keep people
apart and make it impossible to see and hear
one another and get things done.
Living in the digital
age provides enormous opportunities to help
break the gridlock and move forward. The
bipartisan Knight Commission on the Information
Needs of Communities in a Democracy
found
that communities need robust news and
information ecologies if people are to be
informed and engaged, and if they are to solve
public problems and improve their own
lives.
Certainly new
technologies are helpful, but beware: not all
actions will be productive, and some will be
downright harmful. For instance, just
increasing the number of blogs and RSS feeds,
or building more Twitter followers and Facebook
friends, may lead people to fragment further
into isolated groups, exactly at a time when we
need to come together.
Moreover, using
digital tools to build bigger megaphones,
gather more protestors, and occupy public and
private spaces will not produce the kind of
public discourse, engagement opportunities or
problem solving people are looking for. People
want less noise and acrimony, not
more.
A
different path is needed.
Pierre Omidyar, the
eBay founder, recently wrote that Steve Jobs'
legacy could be summed up in two words, "Think
Different." This catchy phrase was more than
good Apple ad copy. It was rooted in an
enduring faith in people and their capacity to
engage, connect, and have a hand in shaping
their own future.
We must apply this
same faith, not to consumer products, but to a
decidedly public purpose: finding new and
practical on-ramps for people to return to the
public square and participate in the life of
their community and nation.
For starters, this
will require that we turn outward toward our
communities. Only then can we know what truly
matters to people - including their individual
and shared aspirations and concerns, and what
we all need to better inform ourselves.
We need to focus on
specific issues that reflect broad community
concerns but are also manageable in scope.
Keeping to well-defined problems makes the
whole effort disciplined, which in turn creates
greater coherence over time. Disciplined,
coherent efforts at identifying and addressing
public concerns will facilitate making clear
choices about what actions to take.
We need to cultivate
boundary-spanning groups. By boundary-spanning
I mean those people and organizations who bring
people together across dividing lines, incubate
new ideas and spin them off, and hold up a
mirror to the community so people can hear and
see one another and their shared realities. In
some communities, public radio and television
stations, community foundations, public
libraries and local United Ways are natural
boundary spanners. But too many organizations
spend too much time looking inward, obsessed
with their own strategic planning, turf battles
and positioning when what is needed are more
active and engaged boundary-spanners.
Communities must make
sure there are enough entry points for people
to engage in the public square, offering ways
for people to come together and helping them
stay connected over time. No one can say for
sure exactly which on-ramps will prove most
important or the form they'll need to take. In
fact, because there is no linear way forward,
we will need courage to adopt a mindset of
innovation - and with it, a willingness to
tolerate fits and starts, even failure, along
the way.
Outrage sits at the
core of human emotions. It is a cry that
something essential in our lives is spinning
out of control and no one seems to be
listening. When outrage in the public square is
left to fester it produces gridlock, even
despair.
What people want is
to make a better life for themselves and to
move the country as a whole forward. To do
this, we must see and hear one another, and
create ways to get things done
together.